EVMSI

Something went wrong.

EVMSIEV MULTI-SECTOR INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED — home

EVMSI Health

Understanding how technology could improve the experience of care

Technology and the future of health

Health technology deserves attention when it addresses a genuine need for patients or the people caring for them. Understanding that promise begins with the evidence and the setting in which it was tested.

Understanding the subjectExplore health technology
A healthier human future01 / 10

Technology in context

Why a promising research finding does not yet establish readiness for routine care

Health information can be difficult to interpret when scientific findings are presented as finished solutions. A research result may be important without yet establishing that a product is ready for routine care.

Explore our approach
5Research directions
1Shared human future
Clinical oversight

Health systems are more than infrastructure. They are the conditions for human potential.

· The EVMSI belief

EVMSI Health / Technology and research

Explore health technology

Health information can be difficult to interpret when scientific findings are presented as finished solutions. A research result may be important without yet establishing that a product is ready for routine care.

EVMSI introduces medical technology and digital health through accessible explanations of their purpose and development. The emphasis is on how an approach could help people and what still needs to be understood before its benefits can be relied upon.

Explore the focus areas
Explore the focus areas

Useful technology fits the way people receive care

Primary care depends on the relationship between a community and the services available to it. Digital records and remote consultations can support parts of that relationship, but they do not remove the need for staff and reliable local services.

Further context

A remote consultation may reduce the need to travel for some appointments while being unsuitable when a physical examination is necessary. Understanding these differences makes it easier to recognise where telemedicine could help and where another form of care remains important.

A promising medical result needs the right context

Biotechnology, medical devices and diagnostic tools address different questions and pass through different forms of development. A laboratory finding, an early study and evidence from routine clinical use should not be presented as though they establish the same thing.

Further context

WHO notes that the pace of digital health development can exceed the available research evidence. Explaining the intended use and the people studied gives readers a better basis for understanding progress than describing every new tool as a medical breakthrough.

Progress should be understood through the people it helps

A technology may aim to improve access to care, reduce an administrative burden or support a clinical decision. Those are different outcomes, so evidence about one should not be used to imply that all have improved.

Further context

The resources needed to keep a service running also matter to the people who depend on it. Costs and continuity deserve attention alongside patient outcomes, without treating financial performance as evidence that a technology is clinically effective.

Care involves more than the technology provider

Patients, clinicians and service managers bring different perspectives to the use of a new technology. Research institutions, public agencies and community organisations may contribute other forms of expertise without playing interchangeable roles.

Further context

The WHO Health Impact Investment Platform provides an external example of health expertise working alongside development finance to strengthen primary care. Its work offers context for understanding collaboration, not evidence of an EVMSI partnership or a programme operated by EVMSI.

Research and the experience of care

Health information can be difficult to interpret when scientific findings are presented as finished solutions. A research result may be important without yet establishing that a product is ready for routine care.

Further context

EVMSI introduces medical technology and digital health through accessible explanations of their purpose and development. The emphasis is on how an approach could help people and what still needs to be understood before its benefits can be relied upon.

Our approach

How health information can support screening, personal records and professional follow up

Consider how screening, personal records, cancer care tools and digital tracking could support people and healthcare teams.

Biotechnology, medical devices and diagnostic tools address different questions and pass through different forms of development. A laboratory finding, an early study and evidence from routine clinical use should not be presented as though they establish the same thing.

The frontier, in focus

The evidence and professional responsibilities needed to assess a proposed health tool

Explore the evidence, permissions and professional responsibilities that each proposed tool would need.

Reviewing personal health information

Personal health information needs a defined purpose and a responsible route to review

Every proposed tool needs a clear role for the professional responsible for care.

Screening and referral

From a signal to specialist review.

Proposed direction

Primary care depends on the relationship between a community and the services available to it. Digital records and remote consultations can support parts of that relationship, but they do not remove the need for staff and reliable local services.

Explore this research direction

Further context

A remote consultation may reduce the need to travel for some appointments while being unsuitable when a physical examination is necessary. Understanding these differences makes it easier to recognise where telemedicine could help and where another form of care remains important.

The question that mattersWho confirms the finding and follows up?

Research directions · EVMSI Health

Precision Health

Understanding the difference between laboratory findings, early studies and clinical evidence

Biotechnology, medical devices and diagnostic tools address different questions and pass through different forms of development. A laboratory finding, an early study and evidence from routine clinical use should not be presented as though they establish the same thing.

Explore Precision Health

From information to follow up

Concept visualization

Explore how a person can contribute information and follow changes over time.

A closer look at possibility

Exploring medical research through its intended use and the evidence still needed

EVMSI introduces medical technology and digital health through accessible explanations of their purpose and development. The emphasis is on how an approach could help people and what still needs to be understood before its benefits can be relied upon.

Concept visualization

Biologically inspired design

How biologically inspired research begins with a specific care need

Research should begin with a defined care need, a review process and the evidence required for the intended use.

Explore the Wyss Institute
Concept visualization

Miniaturized diagnostics

What a diagnostic tool needs to demonstrate beyond a promising early result

WHO notes that the pace of digital health development can exceed the available research evidence. Explaining the intended use and the people studied gives readers a better basis for understanding progress than describing every new tool as a medical breakthrough.

Explore NIH research

Design priorities

Assessing a health technology through patient experience, access and continuity of care

Progress starts with what people experience. These are the priorities that guide our thinking.

Concept imagery

Reading the evidence

Connecting an intended care setting with evidence and professional review

A useful tool needs a defined care setting, appropriate evidence and a clear route from information to professional review.

Begin with a care need and the people responsible for the next step. Identify where information or coordination is missing.

Research in context

Connected technology subjects

How information systems, reliable power and specialist facilities support healthcare

Our perspective crosses sectors. Health innovation depends on the intelligence, energy and infrastructure around it.

01

Intelligence

Data foundations, scientific software and responsible AI.

02

Energy

Reliable power for laboratories, manufacturing and critical systems.

03

Infrastructure

Specialist spaces, resilient networks and the capacity to scale.

Our current focus

Understanding the people, records and services needed to keep a health tool useful

Primary care depends on the relationship between a community and the services available to it. Digital records and remote consultations can support parts of that relationship, but they do not remove the need for staff and reliable local services.

Join us

Explore how information becomes part of a care decision

Read about artificial intelligence and research methods to understand why data quality and testing conditions matter when interpreting a technology claim.

Explore intelligence and evidenceExplore our sectors